Livre - Totalitarian and authoritarian discourses

320 CRA

Description

Livre

Peter Lang

Crauwels Geert

Şerban Henrieta Anişoara

Presentation materielle : 1 vol. (vii-349 p.)

Dimensions : 23 cm

This volume offers a comparative analysis of the functioning of totalitarian and authoritarian discourses and their aftermath. Whereas other studies often focus on communist/post-communist examples and hence particularize totalitarian discourse, this book starts from a more encompassing theoretical perspective, transcending the limitation of totalitarian discourse to its communist constituent. The case studies presented in this volume thus provide a more differentiated analysis of discursive strategies in totalitarian and authoritarian regimes across the globe, including the former East Germany, former Yugoslavia, Romania, Lithuania, China, North Korea, the Philippines, Burma, Cuba and Tunisia. In addition to this geographical range, these studies also undertake new research into different eras, enabling comparison between past and present discourses. The findings are presented in three interconnected sections dealing with culture and education, media and official discourse, and power structures and politics. The extended scope of the case studies reveals the universal characteristics of totalitarian/authoritarian discourses over space and time. Lutgard Lams is Associate Professor of Pragmatics, Media Discourse Analysis and Intercultural Communication at University College Brussels and Associate Research Fellow in the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Catholic University of Louvain. Her recent publications focus on the media discourse of China and the relationship between China and the West. Geert Crauwels is Assistant Professor of German Language and Culture in the German Department at Leiden University. His research focuses on power in contemporary German-language literature and on totalitarian discourse. Henrieta Anişoara Şerban is Senior Researcher at the Institute of Political Science and International Relations and the Institute of Philosophy and Psychology ‘Constantin Rădulescu-Motru’ in the Romanian Academy, Bucharest. She is also an associate member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists. Her research interests include the philosophy of science and communication and political communication.

Introduction, p. 1 ȘERBAN Henrieta Anișoara, Theoretical Argument. Totalitarian Discourse: The New Snow White/Society in the Discursive Wooden Mirror, p. 15 Part I Creation – Identity and Memories, p. 39 PANTELIMON Răzvan Victor, Uses and Abuses of Che Guevara’s Myth in Political Cuban Discourse, p. 41 CRAUWELS Geert, The I and the Socialist Personality: The Questioning of an Ideological Concept in Post-GDR Literary Autobiographical Discourse, p. 61 SEPP Arvi, Totalitarianism and Performativity: The Redemptive Language of National Socialism in Nazi Poetry, p. 99 FRAYSSE-KIM Soonhee, Constructing Them and Us in North Korea, p. 123 Part II Mass Communication and Of ficial Discourse, p. 155 TIGNO Jorge V. and ENCINAS-FRANCO Jean, The Language of Dictatorship in the Philippines: Marcos and Martial Law, p. 157 LAMS Lutgard, Strategies of Symbolic Meaning Construction in Chinese Of ficial Discourse, p. 185 DOBRIVOJEVIĆ Ivana, From Liberators to Villains: The Transformation of the Image of the Soviet Soldier in the Yugoslav Press (1945–1953), p. 217 PETRAUSKAITĖ Rūta, The Pathos of the Soviet Press, p. 235 Part III Power Structures – Politics and Truth, p. 261 KO KO Thett, The Myth of the Indispensability of the Military in Burmese Political Culture: Totalitarian Discourse in the State of Myanmar, p. 263 MANOLACHE Viorella, Totalitarian Discourse and the Rule of ‘Anti-’, p. 293 SARROUKH Abdenbi, Some Aspects of Totalitarian Discourse in Ben Ali’s Tunisia, p. 313 Notes on Contributors, p. 335 Index, p. 341

Bibliogr. en fin de chapitre. Index.